Compare · Agent orchestration

Zentty vs Supacode

A coding-agent command center, and a terminal with agent attention.

Download for macOS Supacode site →

Overview

Supacode and Zentty both use libghostty and both assume you bring your own CLI agents. Supacode is much more orchestration-heavy: it is built around many agents, git worktree isolation, and GitHub workflows. Zentty is the smaller layer around the terminal: panes, worklanes, and attention state.

What each tool is

Zentty

Zentty is a native macOS terminal, written in Swift and AppKit and built on libghostty. It runs your agents in real shells across worklanes and surfaces the moment an agent needs you: running, idle, needs input, needs approval, done. No telemetry. No editor, file tree, git diff UI, or cloud runtime. It stays a terminal.

Supacode

Supacode is an open-source native macOS app for running many coding agents in parallel. It supports Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other CLI agents, and gives each agent its own git worktree.

Who each tool is best for

Zentty is best for

Zentty is best for Mac developers who run CLI agents like Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, or OpenCode in parallel and want to stay in flow while those agents work in other panes and worklanes.

Supacode is best for

Supacode is best for Mac developers who want to run many agents in parallel with worktree isolation and GitHub-oriented review/PR workflows.

Capability comparison

Dimension Zentty Supacode
Primary purpose Native Mac terminal with worklanes and agent attention Command center for parallel coding agents
Isolation model Your real shells and directories One git worktree per agent
Agent scale Several visible panes and worklanes Designed for dozens of agents
GitHub workflow No built-in PR flow Built-in PR, CI, and conflict workflows
Agent attention Running / idle / needs input / needs approval / done Varies by tool
Built-in editor No — keep your editor Varies by tool
Cloud runtime No — local only Varies by tool
Platform macOS only macOS beta

How to choose

Choose Zentty if
  • You want your agents in normal panes without mandatory worktree isolation.
  • You want a calmer terminal layer instead of a command center.
  • You already handle branches, PRs, and CI outside the terminal.
Choose Supacode if
  • You want many agents running in isolated worktrees.
  • You want GitHub workflows close to the agent sessions.
  • You want an open-source command center focused on agent fan-out.

Common questions

Does Supacode replace a terminal?

Supacode includes Ghostty-backed terminals, but its main point is agent orchestration across worktrees.

Does Zentty support worktree isolation?

Zentty can open shells in worktrees you create, but it does not create one worktree per agent or manage PRs.

Keep comparing

Sources

Last reviewed: 2026-05-23

Run your agents in real panes, and see which one needs you.

Free Native macOS No telemetry